Hi! On Sat, 2014-08-09 at 14:54:13 -0400, Caitlin Matos wrote: > tags 670872 + moreinfo > thanks
> >> It appears that the longer offlineimap runs and the more folders it > >> syncs, the more memory it consumes. Before finishing up syncing my > >> mail (around 70 folders) the process ended up using around 513m VIRT > >> and 335m RES, which is pretty huge. > >> > >> Please let me know how I might help tracking it down, if you need > >> that, as I'm not really familiar with python. > >> > >It grows up to 1G here and doesn't finish the sync before it gets > >OOM-killed. This didn't happen before upgrading from 6.3.4-1. > Can someone verify whether or not this still occurs in 6.5.5-0.1? > > I cannot replicate it, but I do not have so many folders. Yes, pretty much. Although I've since switched to isync, which while evaluating, outperformed offlineimap in speed and memory usage. It halved my sync times to less than 2 minutes, and uses around 8.5 MiB as baseline per folder, and for me it peaks at 25 MiB for one of my largest one with 70k mails, after which it goes back to its baseline, which seems to be what I'd expect from an IMAP syncing program. :) Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
