On 29 July 2014 22:29, Michael Fladischer <mich...@fladi.at> wrote: > > I also note that the version number was called 1.5.0+dfsg-1, which > > suggests you had to repackage the orig.tar.gz file - was this the case? > > See debian/copyright. I excluded the whole embedded librabbitmq-c > library. Thus the +dfsg suffix. >
Sorry, still don't understand why you had to repackage the orig.tar.gz file for this. As far as I can see the clib directory is licensed under the MIT license, so is already ok to distribute under the DFSG. So it makes sense not to use it, but I don't see any justification for repackaging the orig.tar.gz file. Did I miss something? -- Brian May <br...@microcomaustralia.com.au>
