On 2014-08-04 Simon McVittie <smcv-8fiuurrzop0dnm+yrof...@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format) > > ------------------------------------------------ > > Depends: libacl1 (>= 2.2.51-8), libaudit1 (>= 1:2.2.1), libblkid1 (>= > > 2.17.2), [-libc6 (>= 2.17),-] libcap2 (>= 2.10), libcryptsetup4 (>= > > 2:1.4.3), libdbus-1-3 (>= 1.1.1), [-libgcrypt11 (>= 1.5.1),-] libkmod2 (>= > > 5~), [-liblzma5 (>= 5.1.1alpha+20120614),-] libpam0g (>= 0.99.7.1), > > libselinux1 (>= 2.1.9), [-libsystemd-daemon0 (= 208-5),-] > > libsystemd-journal0 (= 208-5), libudev1 (>= 189), libwrap0 (>= 7.6-4~), > > libsystemd-login0 (= 208-5), util-linux (>= 2.19.1-2), initscripts (>= > > 2.88dsf-17), sysv-rc, udev, acl, adduser, libcap2-bin > > {+Pre-Depends: libc6 (>= 2.17), libdbus-1-3 (>= 1.0.2), libgcrypt11 (>= > > 1.5.1), liblzma5 (>= 5.1.1alpha+20120614), libselinux1 (>= 2.0.65), > > libsystemd-daemon0 (= 208-5)+}
> Expanded dependency tree: > libc6 is already quasi-Essential, via e.g. coreutils > libdbus-1-3 Depends: libc6 (>= 2.17) > libgcrypt11 Depends: libc6 (>= 2.15) > libgcrypt11 Depends: libgpg-error0 (>= 1.10), already satisfied in stable [...] Hello, Could you use this opportunity to move to libgcrypt20? It would be nice to avoid adding th pre-dependency on libgcrypt11 now and later have another discussion when replacing with one on libgcrypt20. thanks for considering, cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org