reassign 341675 libgcc2 4.0.2-5
thanks

On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 06:56:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:41:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > This is a bug that was believed fixed previously, but it is *not* bug
> > #326581; it's bug #333766, which was fixed in glibc 2.3.5-7.  (And it really
> > was fixed, otherwise kdelibs4c2 wouldn't be in testing right now for hppa.)
> > But it's back in 2.3.5-8; could this have to do with the fact that 2.3.5-7
> > was built (wrongly) with gcc-4.0, and 2.3.5-8 is the first version to build
> > with gcc-3.4?

> I confirm. Bug #333766 was causing a SIGBUS in uic, when calling 
> feholdexcept. This has been fixed, and now the problem is a SIGILL that
> occurs a few instructions later when calling __umoddi3 from 
> libgcc_s.so.2.

> I have tried other version of libgcc2, from version 4.0.1-7 to version
> 4.1-0exp4, and the problem is always there. So it does not seems related
> to a recent change in gcc. Maybe this part of code was never called
> before for some strange reasons.

> It would be nice if somebody fluent with hppa assembly can tell us if 

>       fldw -10(,sp),fr23

> is a valid instruction or not. If not, that's probably a miscompilation
> in gcc, as this code is generated from C code.

Ok; reassigning to libgcc2 then.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to