On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 03:55:04PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> On 26.01.2014 22:30, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > Second, for supporting all possible upgrade and partial upgrade
> > scenarios (not only between wheezy and jessie, Debian-derived
> > distributions like Ubuntu might have different collections of
> > packages), apache2-bin needs to have a versioned Breaks: against
> > the broken versions of all of the packages in [1] and [2].
>
> Why? Packages in [2] aren't supposed to depend on apache2.2-bin (with
> some few exceptions, against which ones we /do/ have Breaks in place).
> Module packages depend on apache2.2-common, where we do force removal
> upon upgrade, so that in turn, obsolete dependencies without proper
> replacement are removed, too.
>...
I do not claim to fully understand the Debian apache packaging,
and after a quick test it seems you are right that you already
have that covered.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
