Sergei Golovan <sgolo...@nes.ru> (2014-07-17): > Hi Cyril, > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > Sergei (in cc): that package needs an update before the old binary can > > be removed, and so that your package can be a candidate for migration to > > testing. In the meanwhile, it's not because it has out-of-date binaries. > > I understand that, thank you for the clarification. Though > libexpect-php5 has another two RC bugs, one of which was reported more > than 2 years ago (see [1]). I can fix #755102 in NMU, but would this > fix be reasonable given that I'm not going to fix #667767 and #752628 > (especially the latter). > > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667767
Yeah, I saw that while filing the bug report. Another easy way out if breaking that package, which is a decision I'll leave to the release guy going to request the decruft on the FTP side. :) I just thought documenting the build-dep issue explicitly was a good idea. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
