On 14/07/14 23:17, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:34:35AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 14/07/14 09:05, Niko Tyni wrote:
>
>>> So can I go ahead with dropping perlapi-5.18.2 or do we need to dig in
>>> the libimager-perl/libpng problem first?
>>
>> If you're ok with removing libimager-perl, libimager-qrcode-perl and
>> libmojomojo-perl from testing if those don't get fixed in time, then yes.
>
>> As for sereal, we'd need to remove libsereal-{en,de}coder-perl,
>> libsession-storage-secure-perl and libdancer-session-cookie-perl.
>
> The libimager-perl/libpng thing looks thorny enough that I don't
> think we should wait for that. The libsereal-encoder-perl package
> has been failing on s390x for a long time, if it has to be removed
> then so be it.
>
> I've just uploaded perl_5.18.2-7 providing only perlapi-5.18.2d on s390x
> and closing this bug (#753444).
Sounds good, thanks for your work!
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
