control: reopen -1 > From: Camm Maguire <c...@maguirefamily.org> > To: 752221-d...@bugs.debian.org > Cc: > Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 17:26:39 -0400 > Subject: [axiom] Some sources are not included in your package > Greetings, and thanks for your report! > > The file alleged to be problematic: > > src/axiom-website/axiomgraph/js/arbor.js
I respectfully disagree according to source it is minified from at least: * etc.js * kernel.js * atoms.js * system.js * physics.js Thus reopen Bastien http://sources.debian.net/src/axiom/20120501-16/src/axiom-website/axiomgraph/js/arbor.js > > is itself a source file, specifically sourcecode in javascript. > > Take care, > -- > Camm Maguire c...@maguirefamily.org > ========================================================================== > "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> > To: Debian Bug Tracking System <sub...@bugs.debian.org> > Cc: > Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 12:00:24 +0200 > Subject: [axiom] Some sources are not included in your package > Package: axiom > Version: 20120501-14 > user: debian...@lists.debian.org > usertags: source-is-missing > severity: serious > X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@debian.org > > Hi, > > Your package seems to include some files that lack sources > in prefered forms of modification: > > src/axiom-website/axiomgraph/js/arbor.js > > According to Debian Free Software Guidelines [1] (DFSG) #2: > "The program must include source code, and must allow distribution > in source code as well as compiled form.". > > This could also constitute a license violation for some copyleft > licenses such as the GNU GPL. > > In order to solve this problem, you could: > 1. repack the origin tarball adding the missing source to it. > 2 add the source files to "debian/missing-sources" directory > > Both way satisfies the requirement that we ship the source. Second option > might be preferable due to the following reasons [2]: > - Upstream can do it too and you could even supply a patch to them, > thus full filling our social contract [3], see particularly ยง2. > - If source and non-source are in different locations, ftpmasters may > miss the source and (needlessly) reject the package. > - The source isn't duplicated in every .diff.gz/.debian.tar.* (though > this only really matters for larger sources). > > You could also ask debian...@lists.debian.org or #debian-qa for more > guidance. > > [1] https://www.debian.org/social_contract.en.html#guidelines > [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736873#8 > [3] https://www.debian.org/social_contract > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
