Control: tag -1 + pending Hi Antonio,
Antonio Radici wrote: > if you have time it would be great if you could prepare an NMU for the patch > at > the existing release This sentence of yours was originally meant for #748918 which arose to being already fixed in Sid and Jessie. Me closing #748918 in Sid and Jessie bumped the autoremoval date from tomorrow to 11th of July. The cvurrent autoremoval is triggered by #670681 which has been upped to RC severity on Saturday IIRC. I've prepared an NMU to fix #670681. See the git commit at http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/postgrey.git;a=commitdiff;h=0f28b7d153ea42de08054f542e81deb4c04631e6 (I pushed it to a newly created "nmu" branch which I'll merge and remove as soon as the package hits the archive.) This seems to also fix #630353 which is likely a follow up error of #670681 (or vice versa; they're at least related). I hope this NMU is ok for you, too. If so, please tell me and I'll upload it more or less immediately. If I don't hear from you, I'll upload it to DELAYED/2 -- probably tomorrow. > and then I can add you as co-maintainer and we can work on > the 1.35 packaging (there is already a git, you just need to be on > collab-maint). > > On the long run we should run postgrey using a team rather than a single > person > (me), that should make things easier in terms of maintainership and uploads. Having worked through the package and bugs, I may start working on importing 1.35 and modernising the packaging a little bit on my own. But I'll do that in a separate branch for now, so you can review it in case you're not happy about e.g. source format "3.0 (quilt)" or a "dh" style debian/rules file. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
