Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Russ Allbery [Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:08:18 -0800]:
>> The version in testing will break horribly if libkrb53 1.4.3 is >> installed. In order to give people a chance to not have their Apache >> modules break, libkrb53 conflicts with the older version of >> libapache-mod-auth-kerb, but basically 1.4.3 going into testing will >> break the l-a-m-k in testing. > Oooh. Well, (a) that's very sane, since they won't be co-installable, > which does not qualify as 'breaks' in my book; Well, but libapache-mod-auth-kerb depends on libkrb53, so basically while everyone's existing installation will work at the cost of apt-get holding back libkrb53, no one would be able to install the package. So it's not as bad as it could be, but it is kind of annoying. > and (b) britney will block krb53 from entering testing until l-m-a-k > is ready to go, since otherwise the uninstallability count in testing > would increase. So far so good. :) Huh, really? I didn't think it worked that way -- extra priority packages are allowed to conflict with other packages, for instance, and they migrate into testing. If libapache-mod-auth-kerb conflicted with the newer version of krb5, or if krb5 had changed SONAMEs, I knew that would happen, but neither of those is going on in this case. If that's the case, then libapache-mod-auth-kerb is going to hold up KDE as well until we push the whole thing. (The new version is uploaded now.) -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>