Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:40:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line debtags: segfault in postinst
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2005 22:14:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 14:14:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ip-15.net-81-220-246.rev.numericable.fr ([81.220.246.15]
helo=bihash)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EkqVx-0000Ce-Pf
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 14:14:54 -0800
Received: by bihash (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6A3DE14368D; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 23:14:52 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ashar Voultoiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debtags: glibc invalid pointer
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 23:14:52 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_DSBL,RCVD_IN_SBLXBL,RCVD_IN_SBLXBL_5,RCVD_IN_SORBS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: debtags
Version: 1.5.2+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
I am running testing and recently upgraded apt to unstable (to test a bug
fix for apt-build). When running apt-get upgrade everything got upgraded
but debtag.
The output actually is:
# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B of archives.
After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? YES
Setting up debtags (1.5.2+b1) ...
Get:1 http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/tags/tags-current.gz [208kB]
Get:2 http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/tags/vocabulary.gz [13.9kB]
Fetched 222kB in 2s (100.0kB/s)
Reading tag data and vocabulary for http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/tags/...
Tag data: /var/cache/debtags/debtags.alioth.debian.org_tags_tags-current.gz...
Voc data: /var/cache/debtags/debtags.alioth.debian.org_tags_vocabulary.gz...
Writing system vocabulary...
Writing merged tag database...
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x08599e80 ***
/var/lib/dpkg/info/debtags.postinst: line 22: 8138 Aborted
debtags update
dpkg: error processing debtags (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 134
Errors were encountered while processing:
debtags
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
#
Might be cause the glibc need to be upgraded to unstable version too.
I also have libc6-i686 package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages debtags depends on:
ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.1 0.6.43 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii libc6 2.3.5-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-5 GCC support library
ii libstdc++6 4.0.2-5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libtdb1 1.0.6-13 Trivial Database - shared library
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-8 compression library - runtime
debtags recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 341945-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 11:40:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 03:40:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86]
helo=tennyson.dodds.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Em8Vr-0003wI-Eo
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:40:07 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 31A5B7007; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:40:07 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:40:07 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: debtags: segfault in postinst
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="j3zO+32zXj6UcJCE"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--j3zO+32zXj6UcJCE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Version: 1.5.2+b2
Fixed in binNMU.
Cheers,
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--j3zO+32zXj6UcJCE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDnrMXKN6ufymYLloRAgJyAJ9LsqUcCFb3DhWL7UFtCvAyDCpyKwCgpXKi
WoPX8xKwONcWO3MQeSdEbi4=
=PJOB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--j3zO+32zXj6UcJCE--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
