On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 01:15:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Control: reopen -1 > > Roger, > > > Please could you apply the following patch. We are planning to upgrade > > the version of insserv, and testing shows that the new version breaks > > on the dependencies declared by rpcbind (which doesn't match the > > dependent nfs-common). This change adjusts the start runlevels to > > match nfs-common. > > What do you mean, it doesn't match? The nfs-common init script has: > > # Default-Start: S > # Default-Stop: 0 1 6
I'm not sure myself. I can't recall the details offhand I'm afraid; I've spent the intervening months dealing with RSI and haven't done any work on this since then. > Anibal has reverted my deliberate change to rpcbind's init script, in > response to this bug report which makes no sense. Why did you think it was > appropriate to mark rpcbind for start in both runlevel S and runlevels 2 3 4 > 5? I was asked to test insserv from experimental, sometime before opening this bug. I found that the rpcbind LSB headers caused insserv to fail, and this fixed things. IIRC I discussed this with the insserv maintainer but I could be wrong. The reasons for this I'm not sure. It may be there needed a corresponding change to nfs-common, but I don't think that was the case. During this period I couldn't even hold the pages of a book open, let alone type properly, so it's possible I've missed something. Sorry I can't help more here. I really can't recall the specifics, and I'm not able to do more investigation at present due to my hands. Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools `- GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
