Your message dated Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:45:58 +0200
with message-id <20140429174556.ga2...@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#722542: gcc-spu went away but is still being used
has caused the Debian Bug report #722542,
regarding gcc-spu went away but is still being used
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
722542: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722542
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcc-defaults,newlib
Severity: important
Dear maintainers of gcc-defaults and newlib,
I noticed that gcc-defaults have removed the "gnu-spu" package in sid,
but newlib still build-depends on it. Since there was no bug against
either package, I am assuming no one has noticed this so far. As it
is, this is one (of several) things blocking gcc-defaults migration to
testing.
This bug can be fixed either by re-introducing gcc-spu (possibly as a
transitional package, if gcc-spu is no longer needed) or by newlib no
longer Build-Depending on gcc-spu (since it is the last package using
it). I will leave it to you to decide how this will be solved; please
reassign this bug to the proper package.
Thank you in advance,
~Niels
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.0.0-1
Hi Agustin,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 09:46:55AM -0300, Agustin Henze wrote:
> Hi all, I'm glad to announce that I've adopted this package :) and I've
> uploaded a new version (2.0.0-1). This version doesn't build newlib-spu
> anymore. It arrived on the archive a few days ago, should I request the
> removal
> of the old packages for close this bug?
As the issue is fixed in version 2.0.0-1, this bug can be closed. It still has
to migrate to testing, but that's a different issue.
Cheers,
Ivo
--- End Message ---
