Source: pry Version: 0.9.12.6-1 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > Bacon::Error: "bigdecimal (1.2.0)\nio-console (0.4.2)\njson > (1.7.7)\nmetaclass (0.0.4)\nminitest (4.3.2)\nmocha (1.0.0)\npsych > (2.0.0)\nrake (0.9.6)\nrdoc (4.0.0)\nslop (3.4.7)\ntest-unit > (2.0.0.0)\n".=~(/bacon \(/) failed > /«PKGBUILDDIR»/spec/commands/gem_list_spec.rb:14:in `block (2 levels) > in <top (required)>': gem-list - should work arglessly > /«PKGBUILDDIR»/spec/commands/gem_list_spec.rb:11:in `block in <top > (required)>' > /«PKGBUILDDIR»/spec/commands/gem_list_spec.rb:3:in `<top (required)>' > > 980 tests, 1401 assertions, 1 failures, 0 errors > debian/ruby-tests.rb:1:in `<main>': unhandled exception > ERROR: Test "ruby2.0" failed: The full build log is available from: http://aws-logs.debian.net/ftbfs-logs/2014/04/26/pry_0.9.12.6-1_unstable.log A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
