Quoting Clint Adams (2014-04-24 03:21:56) > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 07:04:55PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Also, why did you relax dependency on polyparse beyond what upstream >> package declared compatible with? I am aware that a newer polyparse >> is in Debian, but it concerns be that you are absolutely silent about >> that in changelog and commit message only contains this: >> >> Update b-d upper bounds. > > In retrospect, I probably should have done libghc-polyparse-dev (<< > 1.9-999) or libghc-polyparse-dev (<< 1.9.0.0.0.1), unless there's a > better way to express polyparse (>=1.6 && <=1.9).
Ahhh - thanks for opening my eyes: What puzzled me wasn't the tiny frasction you now reflect on, but instead that I had misread the upstream declaration as "<<1.9". - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
