Control: severity -1 important Hi Jeff,
thanks for the quick feedback! Jeff Licquia wrote: > On 03/31/2014 07:29 AM, Axel Beckert wrote: > > From my point of view it does not render the package generally > > unusable, just for the case where the server is an significantly older > > version. > > > > Then again, the case with Jessie and Wheezy is likely no seldom one, > > so I think if there's a chance to fix this issue, it should be fixed > > before the freeze for Jessie. > > > > I checked the upstream bug tracker and found only one entry similar to > > this issue. Unfortunately it was tagged "invalid": > > > > http://synergy-foss.org/spit/issues/details/3562/ > > My plan to "fix" this bug is to make a version of synergy 1.4 available > in wheezy-backports. Good idea! > I suspect this will become a problem more and more with other distros as > well; upstream considers 1.3 to be obsolete, and other distros are > updating synergy as well. So, I consider the existence of a backport > for wheezy to be the best resolution we can hope for. Yes, but it's definitely not release-critical if backwards compatibility is a just not supported feature. (Lowering the severity also prevents synergy to be (auto-)removed from testing which would hinder uploading a backport, too.) Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
