package stunnel4
owner 740802 !
tag 740802 + pending
kthxbye

Hi,

Thanks for reporting this!  I saw it independently in Michal Trojnara's
announcement of stunnel-5.00, but it's good to have it in the BTS, too.

I've backported the fix from stunnel-5.00 to the Git repository of the
Debian package of stunnel, it will be part of the next upload that will
happen soon (once I clean up the packaging a bit more, update to a more
recent upstream release and put a package up for sponsoring).

However, I think that in this particular case we may demote the bug's
severity a bit - although it does pose a serious problem for stunnel
used in the fork model, the Debian package uses the pthreads model and
is thus not affected at all by the bug or the fix.  Would you agree with
this assessment?

I've added the patch anyway for the benefit of people who use the Debian
source package as a baseline for building their own instances of
stunnel.  With the above in mind, should I build a package of stunnel
as-is in the Git repository right now (still needs a bit more cleanup,
quite outdated version, etc) and put it up for sponsorship with a high
urgency, or should I change the bug's severity and upload the
"refreshed" stunnel package in a couple of days?

Thanks again for this notification and your work on Debian in general!

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
Peter Pentchev  r...@ringlet.net r...@freebsd.org p.penc...@storpool.com
PGP key:        http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115  C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
This would easier understand fewer had omitted.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to