Hi Andreas Thanks. You are right. This was required before, but when /etc/sudoers.d was introduced this is no longer necessary.
On the other hand dpsyco is not used by many, so maybe we should just remove the package altogether. // Ola On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org> wrote: > Package: dpsyco-sudo > Version: 1.0.36 > Severity: serious > Tags: jessie sid > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > Control: sffects -1 + dpsyco > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles. > This is forbidden by the policy, see > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files > > debsums reports modification of the following files, > from the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): > > /etc/sudoers > > With the introduction of /etc/sudoers.d dpsyco-sudo should just place > its modifications there. > > > cheers, > > Andreas > -- --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology ---- / o...@inguza.com Annebergsslingan 37 \ | o...@debian.org 654 65 KARLSTAD | | http://inguza.com/ Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / ---------------------------------------------------------------
