Your message dated Wed, 29 Jan 2014 19:23:33 +0100
with message-id <20140129192333.7d55c...@swetlana.brachium-system.net>
and subject line fixed in 0.9.12.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #735864,
regarding pry: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby1.9.1" failed.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
735864: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735864
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pry
Version: 0.9.12.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140114 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ruby1.9.1 -I/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/test_runner.rb
> Ruby v1.9.3 (ruby), Pry v0.9.12.2, method_source v0.8.2, CodeRay v1.1.0, Slop
> v3.4.7
> ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................F..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
> Bacon::Error:
> #<Proc:0x00000002a260f0@/«PKGBUILDDIR»/spec/commands/cd_spec.rb:47>.raise?(Pry::CommandError)
> failed
> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/spec/commands/cd_spec.rb:47:in `block (4 levels) in <top
> (required)>': when an error was raised - should not toggle and should keep
> correct stacks
> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/spec/commands/cd_spec.rb:46:in `block (3 levels) in <top
> (required)>'
> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/spec/commands/cd_spec.rb:45:in `block (2 levels) in <top
> (required)>'
> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/spec/commands/cd_spec.rb:35:in `block in <top
> (required)>'
> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/spec/commands/cd_spec.rb:3:in `<top (required)>'
>
> 985 tests, 1402 assertions, 1 failures, 0 errors
> debian/ruby-tests.rb:1:in `<main>': unhandled exception
> ERROR: Test "ruby1.9.1" failed.
The full build log is available from:
http://aws-logs.debian.net/ftbfs-logs/2014/01/14/pry_0.9.12.2-1_unstable.log
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
fixed in 0.9.12.6-1
--- End Message ---
