Your message dated Sun, 4 Dec 2005 03:12:54 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator
change)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 06:57:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 22:57:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ebukl-0007Bx-KN
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:57:16 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA25637
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:13 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A51AF212
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:13 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
id 27310-29 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:13 +0100 (MET) 13911
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:13 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAF6vDgH009284
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:13 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:57:13 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: rosegarden4
Severity: important
Please do not take any action before reading
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html
This bug report is filed against the source package which builds
a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing
*mt_alloc* symbols. The package has to be rebuilt with either
g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (or newer). Please rename the
library package to a name with a "c2a" suffix, and adjust the build
dependencies if dependencies on another renamed library do exist.
Do *not* yet upload the package, but wait for a followup mail to this
bug report.
If this bug report is for some reason invalid, please close it with
a short reasoning.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 339260-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2005 11:12:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 04 03:12:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86]
helo=tennyson.dodds.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Eirna-0005Gl-OZ
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 03:12:54 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6F3647002; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 03:12:54 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 03:12:54 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mXDO3udm/xYWQeMQ"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--mXDO3udm/xYWQeMQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
Matthias Klose previously closed a number of similar bugs with KDE-depending
packages with the following mail:
Christopher Martin writes:
> On November 14, 2005 06:14, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > List of source packages with libraries, which need to be renamed:
> >
> > Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > regina-normal
> > Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > gwenview
> > Debian KDE Extras Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > digikam
> > Enrique Robledo Arnuncio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > rosegarden4
> > Helen Faulkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > labplot
> > Murat Demirten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > sim
>=20
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but these packages depend on kdelibs, and thus a=
s=20
> during the gcc-4.0 transition, shouldn't need to have their libs renamed.=
=20
> They have to be rebuilt to find the new kdelibs4c2a anyway.
>=20
> Note that I only glanced at the list provided to spot KDE-based packages;=
I=20
> did not perform a thorough survey, so there may be others in this categor=
y.
>=20
> It might be good to send follow-up notes to the bugs filed against these=
=20
> packages clarifying the situation, just so that maintainers don't make=20
> unnecessary changes.
closing these reports, because the libraries directly depend on kdelibs4c2
It looks like this bug for rosegarden4 should also have been closed, but
wasn't. Closing now.
Cheers,
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--mXDO3udm/xYWQeMQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDks82KN6ufymYLloRAv+zAKDI36cEoSXP9BUa+cROFORLWJgCYACfRQ1W
zaWFNJv6//lAT01di8AytJU=
=7ThJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--mXDO3udm/xYWQeMQ--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
