On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 02:25:21PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 19:26 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > It appears that libxml++ only has one reverse-dependency in the archive, and > > that all other packages depend on libxml++2.6 now; and libxml++ gave me fits > > trying to rebuild it from source. Perhaps passepartout should be migrated > > to libxml++2.6, and libxml++ dropped from testing/unstable? > Hmm, my ITP (http://www.synfig.com - 2D animation studio) requires > libxml++ 1.0 at the moment. I'll talk to upstream about providing > compatibility with later versions though. Do you know of any information > for migrating to 2.6? Uh, the only change required to rebuild passepartout with libxml++2.6 is to do s/1.0/2.6/ in configure.ac. Do you have specifics on how synfig fails with 2.6? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
