Your message dated Sat, 3 Dec 2005 05:44:33 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341826: libtagcoll-dev: c2a abi transition.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Dec 2005 13:00:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 03 05:00:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from europa.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.75])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EiWzk-0004WZ-1t
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 05:00:04 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id D1EB538634
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:00:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74])
by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB42438345
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:00:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 8456726136; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 14:00:02 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:00:02 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libtagcoll-dev: c2a abi transition.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS,RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libtagcoll-dev
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
It seems your package is still using the c2 ABI instead of the
c2a ABI. They have rescheduled binNMU's of your reverse
dependencies but missed that you also need to do the ABI change
first. I guess it didn't show up because you olny have a static
library and don't have a dependency on libstdc++6.
Kurt
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 341826-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Dec 2005 13:44:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 03 05:44:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86]
helo=tennyson.dodds.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EiXgo-0008KA-Mw
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 05:44:34 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 13B8E7002; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 05:44:33 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 05:44:33 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#341826: libtagcoll-dev: c2a abi transition.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+9faIjRurCDpBc7U"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--+9faIjRurCDpBc7U
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 02:00:02PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: libtagcoll-dev
> Version: 1.5.1-1
> Severity: serious
> It seems your package is still using the c2 ABI instead of the
> c2a ABI. They have rescheduled binNMU's of your reverse
> dependencies but missed that you also need to do the ABI change
> first. I guess it didn't show up because you olny have a static
> library and don't have a dependency on libstdc++6.
Yeah, as we discussed on IRC, the debtags build failure we're seeing is
caused by libapt-front needing to be rebuilt against current apt -- it has
nothing to do with libtagcoll-dev.
If libtagcoll-dev does need rebuilt, we'll find out soon enough -- but
that'll be a separate build failure if and when it happens.
Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--+9faIjRurCDpBc7U
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDkaFBKN6ufymYLloRAl9CAKDTkenldTWu8e1EEJX0mjJ6DrwGmACfdROh
Svqv+zNRqUuwty2W35o4QCA=
=zKQQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--+9faIjRurCDpBc7U--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
