On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Alessandro Ghedini <gh...@debian.org> wrote: > Control: reassign -1 ecasound 2.9.0-1 > Control: retitle -1 ecasound: remove Build-Depends on liblo-dev on sparc > Control: severity -1 serious > > On mar, dic 31, 2013 at 05:01:59 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Joerg Jaspert <jo...@ganneff.de> wrote: >> > On 13437 March 1977, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> > >> >>> I did this now, but as you wrote, you want to get the other maintainers >> >>> to do similar for their packages (or do it yourself). For completness >> >>> sake, this is what dak thinks: >> >> I don't understand. Do you want the other maintainers to ACK the >> >> removal? Or do you want a bug for each package? As far as I understand >> >> it, the current packages (in sparc) are useless so they have to be >> >> removed. >> > >> > Yeah, and someone has to file bugs for those packages. >> >> OK, cloning this bug into all the packages that need removal > > I think the point was to file RC bugs against the packages that currently > Build-Depends on liblo-dev on sparc asking their maintainers to remove that > dependency. Fixing the source of the problem is IMO much better than just > removing packages indiscriminately (moreover no one bothered contacting those > maintainers telling them what is going on). But then again, that's my opinion, > I don't want to put words in Joerg's mouth that he didn't say.
I'm sorry. I thought I had contacted everyone. I checked and I missed contacting the multimedia team :(. Which incidentally maintains the largest number of reverse-deps. That probably explains why nobody replied. Will fix that now. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
