On 12/30/2013 03:15 PM, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 12:03:13 -0800, tony mancill wrote: > >>>>> The rename of the binary package from libclosure-compiler-java -> >>>>> closure-compiler should probably be done now as well to get this out of >>>>> the way well before the Jessie release. > >> It means that the "closure-compiler" binary package is merely the >> /usr/bin/ symlink and the dependency on jarwrapper. > > Can't this be solved with a simple > Provides: closure-compiler > in the libclosure-compiler-java package? > (Or the other way round.) > > Having a de facto empty package doesn't seem very appealing to me.
Hi gregor, Yes, that will work, provided that no users of libclosure-compiler-java have concerns with jarwrapper (and its depdendencies, thus binfmt-support and fastjar) being pulled in when they only want the library. Given that all 3 packages are small, it's probably a non-issue. Thanks for the suggestion! tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
