Hi Mathieu, I appreciate your interest and attention to ITK v3.
On December 29, 2013 12:48:14 PM Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > I would appreciate if someone would double check this patch (1). Or > the other solution (2) is to use the embedded TIFF lib. Since ITK 3.x > is pretty much a branch dead-upstream, I think this would be easier to > have a lintian overrides... > > Steve, what would you go with (1) or (2) ? If it were me doing the work, I would likely have chosen the lazy option #2 because as you say it is dead upstream and hopefully debian packages are moving towards ITK v4. Additionally, it is IMHO the better tested option since it is more likely to be used by folks building ITK themselves from source. But you have done the work of making a patch, so I'm certainly not opposed to using it. I haven't got the free time to evaluate the patch myself. But you noted that it is a partial application of just one upstream change, so the natural question is whether there are any more upstream change sets related to TIFF that need to be considered. Hopefully someone else can chip in with a patch review. Regards, -Steve
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
