On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Mathieu Malaterre <ma...@debian.org> wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/jcupitt/libvips/issues/88
>
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Jay Berkenbilt <q...@debian.org> wrote:
>> Mathieu Malaterre <ma...@debian.org> wrote:
>>
>>> This bug is hard to debug, since libjpeg / libtiff / imagemagick are
>>> all linked together so this is not just a matter of recompiling vips
>>> with libjpeg62-dev unfortunately.
>>
>> The vips in wheezy does seem to have gotten caught up in libjpeg
>> transition issues.  The cases you describe work fine with the current
>> vips in sid and jessie.  I'm not sure what to do about the version in
>> wheezy.  I think the best approach there would probably be to do a
>> backport.  As you noted, vips has a huge list of dependencies, so
>> straightening out this kind of issue can be somewhat problematic.  I
>> don't really have much time or inclination to put a lot of effort into
>> it given that the current versions of the packages work correctly and
>> vips has a relatively small user base, especially in stable.  It's not
>> that I don't think having things work in stable is important -- clearly
>> it is.  I just have very limited time to work on this.
>
> I have forwarded the issue upstream. If this really cannot easily
> fixed with a simple one-liner patch, then yes I'll request a backport.

FYI:

[Please only upload package with a noteable userbase. User request for
the package may be an indicator.]

ref: http://backports.debian.org/Contribute/#index5h3


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to