On 12/02/2013 08:37 AM, Jeff Fearn wrote:
> On 12/01/2013 06:07 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> Hello Jeff,
>>
>> On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Jeff Fearn wrote:
>>> Hi, I've checked in a patch for this. If someone can test it for me I'd 
>>> appreciate it.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/jfearn/XML-TreeBuilder/commit/d81004996dae0f123a77af2c79576e7977559dc0
>>
>> It seems to work fine to fix my issue.
> 
> Great I'll push out a new version this week.
> 
>> Though your change in Build.PL to require XML::Catalog 1.000001 seems
>> bogus (there's no such version released) and I tested only the change of
>> lib/XML/TreeBuilder.pm.
> 
> When I build with '1.0.1' I get this:
> 
> Dotted-decimal prereq '1.0.1' for 'XML::Catalog' is not portable - converting 
> it to '1.000001'
> 
> It was annoying me so I changed the format in Build.PL to the portable 
> version. It works fine for me on my test machines. It will be funny if the 
> non portable version is more portable than the portable version :}
> 
> Cheers, Jeff.
> 

Hi, I just pushed XML::TreeBuilder 5.2 with the patch for this, it'll take a 
while to run through pause. I reverted the version change noted above just in 
case it causes problems.

Cheers, Jeff.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to