On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:03:21PM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote: > Dear maintainer,
> as this bug is RC for 11 days now and a simple patch for fixing it is > available I intent to NMU this package on Wednesday, the 30th, > uploading to DELAYED/7-day. > If I don't hear any feedback from you wrt bug#328958 (RFA for > libmusicbrainz) I'll use the attached patch, otherwise I'll probably > go for Matthias' patch. Is there any reason to not simply drop libmusicbrainz-2.0, in favor of the libmusicbrainz-2.1 package that *everything* else in the archive is using? There currently seem to not be any python bindings for -2.1, but surely we should just get updated bindings instead of keeping -2.0 around. (And in the process, hopefully dropping python2.1/python2.2 in favor of python2.4...) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
