On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:16:31 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > >> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As > >> per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for > >> a release, thus the severity. > actually I observed the problem while testing biomaj-watcher_1.2.1-1 in > contrib, but the failure was already while installing its dependencies.
I know, that's why I tried both :) > > IOW: I can't reproduce the installation failure (amd64 sid chroot, > > DEBCONF_FRONTEND=noninteractive), neither with biomaj-watcher nor > > with biomaj, neither with --with-recommends nor with > > --without-recommends. > > and in that logfile (that is already attached to the bugreport) > I have > > Setting up ca-certificates-java (20130815) ... > done. > Setting up openjdk-7-jre-headless:i386 (7u25-2.3.12-4) ... > update-alternatives: using > /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-i386/jre/bin/java to provide /usr/bin/java > (java) in auto mode > > > ***after*** the biomaj failure - so there was no java, yet. > Looks like dependencies are missing somewhere. Which is weird since biomaj Depends: default-jre | java6-runtime. But yes, something might be wrong somewhere, even if I couldn't reproduce it manually :) (I have vague memories about openjdk-something 6 vs. 7 and update-alternatives.) Oh, and I don't find the lines you quoted above in the log in #726801. > PS: the logfile contains the full piuparts command line I used, look at > the top. Yup; I'll try to have another look in the next days. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Funny van Dannen: Naturfilme
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
