On 2013-10-30 15:41:51, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2013-10-30 15:12, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > >> could anybody please confirm that it pd-iemambi does (not) build > >> on their kfreebsd-* systems? > > > > I confirmed the build failure on fischer.d.o. Note that > > /usr/include/machine/endian.h guards the definition of BYTE_ORDER > > and LITTLE_ENDIAN with #if __BSD_VISIBLE. __BSD_VISIBLE is not > > defined and hence only the versions with leading underscores are > > available. > > thx. > however, do you have an idea why it would *not* fail on my system? > > also note that my <machine/endian.h> (as provided by > kfreebsd-kernel-headers_9.2~4) does not have any protectors, but > instead only includes machine-amd64/endian.h (or > machine-i386/endian.h; depending on the actual architecture) which > also don't have these protectors.
Oh, seems like I didn't update kfreebsd-kernel-headers and built with the same version (9.0-something) as in the failed build on the buildds. I've now successfully built it using the current kfreebsd-kernel-headers version. > > anyhow, i'd rather have the problem fixed. so what is the portable > solution? should i simply define `__BSD_VISIBLE` for kfreebsd-*? I guess it's best to ask the kfreebsd-porters about that. CCing them. Regards -- Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
