Hi, Am Freitag, den 01.11.2013, 08:39 +0100 schrieb Niels Thykier: > On 2013-10-30 11:28, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 30.10.2013, 11:27 +0100 schrieb Niels Thykier: > >> Mean while I discovered that at least agda and haskell-aeson need a > >> binNMU. I was hoping I could convince you to go through the haskell > >> packges and schedule all the necessary binNMUs. > > > > already done about an hour ago :-) > > > > I just scheduled a bunch of binNMUs for various haskell packages on > mipsel (now that haskell-hashable has built on mipsel). I noticed and > filed #728429. Once that has been fixed, some of its rdeps will need a > binNMU (technically, it needs them already now from some architectures, > but it is probably not worth before #728429 is fixed).
unfortunately, that upload was a bit premature, as some of its rdeps don’t have compatible versions yet: http://lists.debian.org/debian-haskell/2013/10/msg00046.html Sorry for that. Raúl will look into it. Not sure what to do about #728429 – it seems that the architecture is to weak to build the package. Note that this has been the norm rather than the exception: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=haskell-src-exts&arch=mips Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
