On 28 October 2013 at 15:17, Niels Thykier wrote: | > And R itself already has (and had for ages) this in | > debian/control::Build-Depends | > | > default-jdk [!arm !hppa !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386 !mips] | > | | You would be missing mipsel then. :)
Oops. We had mips at one point though. Should I subst or add !mipsel ? | > SO I guess we really only need to trigger a rebuild for rJava -- and possibly | > tell the mips builders to ignore this package as it also has | > | | s/mips/mipsel/ | | > default-jdk [!arm !hppa !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386 !mips] Will do. | > but it should really be skipped on all of these/ | > | > Can you remind how I do that again? | > | > Dirk | > | | Set the Architecture field to list only acceptable architectures should | do. From there, the buildds should mark it as "Auto-Not-For-Us" and | ignore it. Mind you, you still have to file a removal bug for binaries | on architectures that (as a consequence) will no longer be built. I never liked that as I would miss 'new' Architectures that are added. But I can of course respond quickly to bug reports suggesting to add these. Maybe I should try this... | An alternative is to Build-Depend on a package that is available on | exactly the architectures your package supports[1]. Again, it would | still need the removal bug, but that is another possibility. | | ~Niels | | [1] This makes for e.g. Build-Depends on an -dev package only available | on certain architectures. I am not certain that it makes sense in this | particular case. Right. Thanks! Dirk -- Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
