On 14/10/13 10:37, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> (2013-10-14): >> libatk-bridge2.0-0-udeb is now available and libgtk-3-0-udeb has >> been rebuilt and so has a proper dependeny on >> libatk-bridge2.0-0-udeb. > > Yes, thanks. We still have other issues, like libatk-bridge vs. > at-spi and at-spi vs. libdbus, but this is getting resolved. FWIW > that can be checked on graphs available at: > http://d-i.debian.org/edos/
The packages higher up the hierarchy need some binNMUs now that libdbus-1-3-udeb exists. I requested at-spi2-core and at-spi2-atk in <http://bugs.debian.org/726122>. It looks as though Gtk3 may have been uploaded frequently enough not to need the same. As far as I understand it, whenever udebs are introduced outside "least dependencies first" order, binNMUs will be needed afterwards. Perhaps dpkg-shlibdeps should fail (make udebs FTBFS) if udebs' library dependencies can only be satisfied by ordinary debs? S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
