severity 340608 important thanks On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 01:41:18PM +0100, Pierre THIERRY wrote: > Scribit Steve Langasek dies 25/11/2005 hora 00:56: > > > According to the FHS, ``/usr is shareable, read-only data''. So FAI > > > should not by default try to write anything in /usr and place it's > > > nfsroot there. See #309554. > > Could you elaborate on why you believe this is an FHS violation?
> My /usr is only rw when doing dpkg operations. After having successfully > installed the fai packaged, running the fai-setup -v fails because /usr > is again ro. > I think the fact that a user-triggered operation has to write in /usr is > the point why there is FHS violation. I certainly agree that it's desirable to never have anything written to /usr except by the package management system and to be able to keep it read-only otherwise, but I don't find that the FHS mandates this. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
