Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#340550: fixed in beagle 0.1.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 2005 03:34:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 23 19:34:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vscan01.westnet.com.au ([203.10.1.131])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Ef7s4-0005qq-Ou
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:34:05 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863C876109D
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:33:29 +0800 (WST)
Received: from vscan01.westnet.com.au ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (vscan01.westnet.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 21754-10 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:33:29 +0800 (WST)
Received: from dsl-202-72-168-241.wa.westnet.com.au 
(dsl-202-72-168-241.wa.westnet.com.au [202.72.168.241])
        by vscan01.westnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144C4761275
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:33:29 +0800 (WST)
Subject: beagle: depends on libraries from experimental
From: Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17
X-Mutt-Fcc: 
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; 
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-0UbeCEEN2JTi3BqfPBxl"
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:33:31 +0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--=-0UbeCEEN2JTi3BqfPBxl
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: beagle
Version: 0.1.2-1
Severity: serious

The version you just uploaded depends on versions of libgnomevfs2-0,
libgtk2.0-0 and libpango1.0-0 from experimental, which makes it
uninstallable in sid. Please recompile using pbuilder or a clean sid
chroot or install.

Also, it would be nice if you could fix or close the other RC bug so
beagle can migrate to testing/etch.

--=20
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

--=-0UbeCEEN2JTi3BqfPBxl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDhTSL5Sc9mGvjxCMRAttdAJwLwdVyMMrrVVTnrmq74O9n3u1UlwCdEzIj
+WYZ4exsZkv6Xik7yWtoxyo=
=wHYX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-0UbeCEEN2JTi3BqfPBxl--


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 340550-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 2005 21:51:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 25 13:51:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EflPV-0006wY-G7; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:13 -0800
From: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#340550: fixed in beagle 0.1.2-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:13 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: beagle
Source-Version: 0.1.2-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
beagle, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

beagle_0.1.2-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/b/beagle/beagle_0.1.2-2.diff.gz
beagle_0.1.2-2.dsc
  to pool/main/b/beagle/beagle_0.1.2-2.dsc
beagle_0.1.2-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/b/beagle/beagle_0.1.2-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated beagle package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 20:28:45 +0100
Source: beagle
Binary: beagle
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 beagle     - indexing and search tool for your personal data
Closes: 331085 340550 340663
Changes: 
 beagle (0.1.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Compiled with unstable dependencies (Closes: #340550, #340663, #331085)
Files: 
 2168c0060e6dbefc9e0e48d0610f1a30 892 gnome optional beagle_0.1.2-2.dsc
 b0272461d16080654754564abd36191e 5502 gnome optional beagle_0.1.2-2.diff.gz
 b03d7cc2dc617d393dce0d0aebb7fc6a 789642 gnome optional beagle_0.1.2-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDh4WJS+BYJZB4jhERAvCYAJ4lOM84EBaJrwUrJyKUIUNr3LY8pwCgoDRT
JTt2B2JR2Y95R1MbuOKR+5c=
=moWE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to