Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> writes: > A conflict with openafs-client isn't really desireable, since that's a > pretty widely installed package at sites that use AFS. Failing renaming, > I'm inclined to split all the backup software off into a separate package > that you can conflict with, since most people aren't using it. (That > would be backup, butc, and fms.)
I've got another bug report suggesting I rename the scripts to have a tar- prefix. Doing so would obviate the need for the Conflicts. I knew there was a reason I'd ignored the bug requesting I package and ship these scripts for nearly a decade... /o\ Bdale
pgpmVt4tv7WiL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
