Source: pithos
Version: 0.3.17-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130922 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Due to the recent switch of pandoc data files to his own package
named pandoc-data.

Relevant part (hopefully):
> copying pithos/AboutPithosDialog.py -> 
> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/./build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7/pithos
> running build_scripts
> creating /«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/scripts-2.7
> copying and adjusting bin/pithos -> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/./build/scripts-2.7
> changing mode of /«PKGBUILDDIR»/./build/scripts-2.7/pithos from 664 to 775
> running build_i18n
> running build_icons
> running build_help
> WARNING: the following files are not recognized by DistUtilsExtra.auto:
>   CHANGELOG
>   debug
>   pithos.desktop
> touch debian/python-module-stampdir/pithos
> pandoc -s -w man ./debian/pithos.1.md -o pithos.1
> pandoc: /usr/share/pandoc/data/templates/default.man: openBinaryFile: does 
> not exist (No such file or directory)
> make: *** [build/pithos] Error 1

The full build log is available from:
   http://aws-logs.debian.net/ftbfs-logs/2013/09/22/pithos_0.3.17-1_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to