On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 08:31:45 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > > The former, i.e. "<< X"; it should break everything less than the first > > fixed version of those packages, since there are broken (pun > > intended). > > Actually, (being a bit pedantic) you should use "<< X~", so backports > cannot satisfy the relation either. In this given case, I don't think > it will make a difference, but I believe it is a good habit to have.
Ack, thanks for adding this detail! Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Aimee Mann: Video
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
