Your message dated Thu, 24 Nov 2005 03:02:25 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#338393: fixed in sbcl 1:0.9.6.55-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Nov 2005 01:33:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 09 17:33:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi [195.197.172.116]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Ea1K5-0002VJ-00; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:33:53 -0800
Received: from angua.pieni.net (ip212-226-168-226.adsl.kpnqwest.fi
[212.226.168.226])
by gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id C367BD7318
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:33:50 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [10.10.100.16] (unknown [10.10.100.16])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by angua.pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757396A6EB
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:33:50 +0200 (EET)
Subject: sbcl: installation fails, register-common-lisp-implementation not
found
From: Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian bugs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:32:43 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: sbcl
Version: 1:0.9.6.0-7
Severity: serious
Justification: package doesn't install without common-lisp-controller
Testing sbcl with piuparts, I find that installation fails:
0m9.6s ERROR: Command failed (status=25600): "chroot /tmp/tmpUMtHi0
apt-get -y install 'sbcl'"
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Suggested packages:
sbcl-common slime
Recommended packages:
binfmt-support
The following NEW packages will be installed:
sbcl
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 9 not upgraded.
Need to get 9141kB of archives.
After unpacking 32.3MB of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://liw.iki.fi sid/main sbcl 1:0.9.6.0-7 [9141kB]
Fetched 9141kB in 0s (10.8MB/s)
Selecting previously deselected package sbcl.
(Reading database ... 7532 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking sbcl (from .../sbcl_1%3a0.9.6.0-7_i386.deb) ...
Setting up sbcl (0.9.6.0-7) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/sbcl.postinst: line
22: /usr/sbin/register-common-lisp-implementation: No such file or
directory
dpkg: error processing sbcl (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
sbcl
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
At first glance, this would indicate a missing dependency on
common-lisp-controller, but looking at the postinst script, it seems
more likely that the bug is here:
if [ -x /usr/lib/common-lisp/bin/sbcl.sh ]; then
/usr/sbin/register-common-lisp-implementation sbcl
fi
The "if" tests for the wrong file, I think.
--
Crappy tools are not worth it. Find or make better ones.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 338393-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 2005 11:12:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 24 03:12:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EfErx-0004lh-V4; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 03:02:25 -0800
From: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#338393: fixed in sbcl 1:0.9.6.55-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 03:02:25 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: sbcl
Source-Version: 1:0.9.6.55-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sbcl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
sbcl-common_0.9.6.55-1_all.deb
to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl-common_0.9.6.55-1_all.deb
sbcl_0.9.6.55-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.6.55-1.diff.gz
sbcl_0.9.6.55-1.dsc
to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.6.55-1.dsc
sbcl_0.9.6.55-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.6.55-1_i386.deb
sbcl_0.9.6.55.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.6.55.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated sbcl package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 21:55:25 +0100
Source: sbcl
Binary: sbcl sbcl-common
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:0.9.6.55-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
sbcl - A development environment for Common Lisp
sbcl-common - Architecture independent files for SBCL
Closes: 338393 340104
Changes:
sbcl (1:0.9.6.55-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Now use dh-lisp correctly. (Closes: #338393)
* Removed :purify t in save-lisp-and-die on advice of upstream. (Closes:
#340104)
* New upstream solves infinite loop in kernel < 2.6.11
Files:
60a0e77b4d5058a03f76768e109c05b2 658 devel optional sbcl_0.9.6.55-1.dsc
f3594a5f5e393d5824f64c0174aa9c0c 4298538 devel optional
sbcl_0.9.6.55.orig.tar.gz
07889d3aa46ada24ca904d10b6142424 20900 devel optional sbcl_0.9.6.55-1.diff.gz
4abb253d82d026eb7613ef056aace352 3989012 devel optional
sbcl-common_0.9.6.55-1_all.deb
c62e04720a82dbc04344ede2026c4046 9073836 devel optional
sbcl_0.9.6.55-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDhZHN11ldN0tyliURAle6AKCMEiLZJskA3jVOdCrrbUoW40PbigCgmMGU
j93BEXkINonpCy1Di7h66i0=
=YH8m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
