Control: severity 721112 normal Filipus Klutiero <chea...@gmail.com> writes:
> Nobody wants to use unstable (nobody reading the FAQ anyway). This statement is false. In context, the advice in the FAQ is fairly nuanced and offers multiple reasons to choose stable. Recommending unstable to moderately experienced users is perhaps not universally good advice, but it will not cause the seas to boil, the sun to fall into the ocean, or computers to explode. It is not universally bad advice, and it is certainly not a release-critical bug in the FAQ in general. > I'm also open to suggest usage of unstable, but only for cherry-picking > solutions. Your bug report fails to explain why anyone involved in Debian development should care about what you are or are not open to. You seem to have confused yourself for a manager who can give other people orders. For the future, please approach issues in Debian with less unnecessary drama. If you feel that something in the documentation is bad advice, the way to advocate for a change is with specific objections, defensible statements, or, in matters of opinion, proposed alternative language. Describing documents as "horrifying" just because they disagree with your personal opinion is not helpful. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
