On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:00:54AM +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Control: tags -1 wontfix
> 
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:00:09AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is no longer
> > installable in sid:
> > 
> >   The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> >    libsamdb0 : Depends: libldb1 (< 1:1.1.7~) but 1:1.1.16-1 is to be 
> > installed
> >   E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> > 
> > While a binNMU should be sufficient to fix up the dependency, this
> > cannot be done due to the FTBFS #713097
> 
> The samba4 source package will go away, as it will be merged into the
> (re)unified samba package (which is version 4.x). As this bug is about the old
> samba4 source package in sid, I'm tagging it as wontfix.
> 
> There are, however, a number of remaining issues with the samba package
> currently in experimental, which is why the new version is not in unstable
> yet.
Since the package is no longer installable anyway, I wonder if it
would make sense to remove the samba4 package from sid. Would anybody
object if I asked for its removal?

Cheers,

Jelmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to