Hi Konstanty, Looking at your fix in c4d4e0478, I'd look into fixing it in a way that doesn't imply that integers overflow, as that's undefined behavior and can be optimised away by compilers. None of the instructions can actually decrease j, so j + 1 can never be <= 0 if integers don't overflow. Wouldn't it be better to just set a limit to j that is checked while calculating the amount of memory that is needed, and that is lower enough than INT_MAX that performing one more iteration won't overflow it?
Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer www.debian.org - get.debian.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
