Hi, I think the below quoted comment is interesting but not really on topic for #591459. Let's discuss this and related general IME and GNOME tracking discussion on 716...@bugs.debian.org
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 03:01:57PM -0600, Ma Xiaojun wrote: > On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Osamu Aoki <os...@debian.org> wrote: > > Anyway, GNOME 3.6 is not stable enough platform yet. It needs to > > stabilize itself before we package for Debian unstable (at least around > > IME related things.) We are shipping GNOME 3.4 so ibus 1.4.? is good > > choice. > > I'm not aware of any concrete stability issue. > However, some methods they are currently using are really problematic. > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688914 > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688916 > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2012-November/msg00091.html > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2012-November/msg00123.html > > > I did not initiate this experimental upload (Asias He and Aron Xu did). > > I think we should keep us out of these new GNOME for unstable. Once we > > see the next RHEL release with newer GNOME 3.8, we will be OK. > > Otherwise, GNOME development releases are really alpha stage quality as > > a whole distribution. > Rumors said RHEL7 is based Fedora 18 and it is clear that Fedora will > use GNOME 3.6. > But GNOME 3.6 integration is very problematic as I mentioned above. > I guess we better correct what GNOME is doing wrong whether than > hopelessly waiting. Now that FEDRA 19 is out. As I mention on http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=716898 FEDORA uses im-choser. Quite frankly, for GNOME world, tracking RHEL is good idea (systemd, ...) if resource is limitted like Debian. Any comment? Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
