On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 23:50:06 +0200, Arno Töll wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for having subversion on the radar. > > > On 09.07.2013 23:10, Julien Cristau wrote: > > as subversion is on the critical path for the update to apache 2.4, I've > > prepared an NMU for subversion (versioned as 1.7.9-1+nmu3) and am going > > to upload it to DELAYED/2. That should (assuming it builds everywhere) > > get it off the crit path and give more time for a proper fix. > > I'm not saying you should not go ahead, but I'd highly appreciate if > people feeling competent enough could have a look at the patches created > by Barry at [1] and [2] which do port Subversion to Apache 2.4. I'm > really not in the position to judge about their impact apart of things > specific to Apache, so maybe Peter could ack them in time before Julien > uploads the proposed NMU? That would be much better than dropping the > Apache modules altogether. > Well from my point of view I'm not sure I agree with the "much better" thing in the short term, since it means more new code that gets entangled with the new apache code and new php code and is just one more chance for things to go wrong.
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
