[Steve Langasek] > It's perfectly sensible: if the scripts were meant to be run in > parallel, they shouldn't have the ".sh" extension...
Eh, are you claiming that policy mention sourcing of .sh scripts to make sure those scripts are not run in paralell? It does not sounds reasonable to me, as the parallel booting feature have never been tried before in Debian. Or are you trying to say something else, like we should change the name of the init.d scripts in /etc/rcS.d/ to allow parallelization? I suspect this part of policy was written to document the current implementation, without considering which part of the implementation should be part of the policy and which part was better left unspecified for future improvements. Am I wrong? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
