Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 05:02:52 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 1.2.0.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Nov 2005 17:42:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 18 09:42:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mobilewave.waldi.eu.org ([82.139.201.22])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EdAFx-0004RD-NE
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:42:38 -0800
Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id EFF721846D; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:42:35 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:42:35 +0100
From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: asterisk - FTBFS: build-depends against not longer built package
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: asterisk
Version: 1:1.2.0.dfsg-1
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of asterisk_1:1.2.0.dfsg-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.4), sed (>= 3.95), zlib1g-dev, libgtk1.2-dev 
> | libgtk-dev, libreadline4-dev | libreadline-dev, libgsm1-dev, libssl-dev, 
> libzap-dev, libtonezone-dev (>= 1:1.0.6-1), bison, libasound2-dev, 
> postgresql-dev, unixodbc-dev, libpri-dev (>= 1.2.0-beta2), dpatch (>= 
> 2.0.10), zaptel-source (>= 1:1.0.6-1), autotools-dev, libnewt-dev, 
> libsqlite-dev, libspeex-dev, graphviz
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>   libreadline4-dev: Depends: libreadline4 (= 4.3-17) but it is not going to 
> be installed
> E: Broken packages
> apt-get failed.
> Package installation failed
> Trying to reinstall removed packages:
> Trying to uninstall newly installed packages:
> Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping asterisk
> ******************************************************************************
> Finished at 20051117-2005
> Build needed 00:00:00, 0k disk space

libreadline4-dev is not longer built.

Bastian

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 339766-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 2005 04:03:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 19 20:03:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx.verfaction.de ([212.9.177.23] ident=Debian-exim)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EdgQJ-0007cU-O4
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 20:03:27 -0800
Received: from erebos.verfaction.de
        ([2001:14b0:201:7357::1] helo=homemx.verfaction.de ident=Debian-exim)
        by mx.verfaction.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
        (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EdgQA-0002ki-6A
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 05:03:25 +0100
Received: from ganymede.verfaction.de ([2001:14b0:201:7357::10])
        by homemx.verfaction.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EdgQ5-0000BB-Bc
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 05:03:16 +0100
From: Kilian Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; 
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+S2tp6v21wigxVtPp9Ft"
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 05:02:52 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:14b0:201:7357::1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in 1.2.0.dfsg-2
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--=-+S2tp6v21wigxVtPp9Ft
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

this has been fixed already in SID. Closing appropriately.

--=-+S2tp6v21wigxVtPp9Ft
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDf/Vsvdkzt4X+wX8RAuKGAJ0W7cgQ38qT2ZVEuTJvGoqv5iPqiACdGX/F
JbOBRq+0agFPWU0p7ehAmB8=
=nwqp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-+S2tp6v21wigxVtPp9Ft--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to