<#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign> On 10477 March 1977, Thomas Bushnell wrote:
>> - Your package was held back since it was requested to ease a move of >> whatever packages to testing. I cant see right now a unblock request in >> my mail folders (but that may be because Im @work, so may be unable to >> find it, limited access to my mailbox @home) and simply skipped it while >> doing NEW and havent checked again if it could go through (sorry). > The unblock was sent on November 2 to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > It was repeated on November 17. Should I send requests directly to > you instead of using that address? Or should I send repeated requests > more frequently? (On what frequency?) Could you read what I wrote? The part in () about the @work. And no, the address is ok. Yes, here @home I can see the mail. >>> Quoting You: >>>Based on past experience, my guess is that it will simply wait, and >>>wait, until it gets whatever special attention it needs. No reupload >>>can change that. >> Pfffrt, wrong. Just always follow what vorlon says and do it. > Can you perhaps tell me what I should do when I have questions like > this? It has certainly been my experience that things which get put > on back burner just stay there. An excellent example is this very > example: what happened between November 2nd and today? We are all 17 days older now. > Vorlon's email seems to have received an instantaneous response from > you, where my email on November 2 is unanswered after more than two > weeks. Is this normal procedure, or did something unusual happen in > this case? Nothing unusual, I just happened to have a minute to comment on this bug when he asked me on IRC. -- bye Joerg <lenny> schneidet nie chilis und wascht euch dann _nicht_ die hände und reibt euch dann an der nase. <lenny> uargs, wie das brennt <lenny> hammer. das ist ja schlimmer als die dinger zu essen...
pgplZRHzuGYOW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
