On 22/06/13 at 21:21 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + unreproducible
>
> On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 15:24:21 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > Source: license-reconcile
> > Version: 0.2
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: jessie sid
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
> > Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> > amd64.
> >
> > Relevant part:
>
> > > # Failed test at t/16-rules-maxversion.t line 42.
> > > # Compared $data->[0]{"file"}
> > > # got : 'base.h'
> > > # expect : 'base'
> > > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 3.
> > > t/16-rules-maxversion.t ...
> > > Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
> > > Failed 1/3 subtests
>
> > > # Failed test at t/19-rules-verify.t line 40.
> > > # Compared $data->[0]{"file"}
> > > # got : 'base.h'
> > > # expect : 'base'
> > > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 3.
> > > t/19-rules-verify.t .......
> > > Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
> > > Failed 1/3 subtests
>
>
> I can't reproduce these test failures, even with running the two
> tests in a loop for quite some time.
>
> Anyone else?
Erm, I can... I wonder if it's due to a sort order in @data?
Lucas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
