On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 21:39 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 19/06/13 21:32, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > [...] so was correctly closed unversioned; marking it as fixed in > > any version is wrong. > > That left it marked as 'found' in some version though. Is that correct?
In the sense that the bug was reported against that version, yes. It shouldn't matter either way given the closure though. > > What was the problem you were trying to solve? AFAICS, it was correct to > > begin with. > > This is what I was really trying to influence. But its version tracking > may be broken: > > http://blends.debian.net/edu/bugs/desktop-gnome.html fwiw, quoted with permission from #debbugs: 21:48 < adsb> certainly it was my understanding that closed with no fixed versions rendered found versions irrelevant 21:48 < dondelelcaro> adsb: right, it does 21:48 < dondelelcaro> if it's -done and there's no fixed versions, it's fixed everywhere 21:49 < adsb> glad I'm not going entirely crazy :) 21:49 < adsb> apparently someone needs to fix blends.d.n's understanding then 21:49 < dondelelcaro> ah 21:49 < dondelelcaro> wouldn't surprise me if someone got it wrong if they're not using the actual code in the BTS... it is kind of subtle Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
