On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 19:01:06 +1000, Mark Purcell wrote: > On Thu, 9 May 2013 14:23:36 Ralf Treinen wrote: > > Version: libucommon5-dbg/5.2.2-4 > > Version: libucommon6-dbg/6.0.4-1 > > Jonas, > > Could I suggest that do not version the -dbg package. > > Whilst there is a use to have the library package versioned, > there is little to be gained by versioning the -dbg package, > and it does lead to ongoing conflicts like this one. > It only leads to conflicts if you put debug symbols for non-versioned files in it (just like with shared library packages). And if you don't use build-id.
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
